<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple and the art of innovation</title>
	<link>http://blog.kennisland.nl/knowledgeland/2007/06/11/apple_and_the_art_of_innovation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Acheson</title>
		<link>http://blog.kennisland.nl/knowledgeland/2007/06/11/apple_and_the_art_of_innovation/#comment-50808</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Acheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kennisland.nl/knowledgeland/2007/06/11/apple_and_the_art_of_innovation/#comment-50808</guid>
		<description>Innovation? The touchpad interface, made famous first and foremost by Apple's very well-marketed products, is certainly an innovative feature.

But it seems that Apple may have stolen the idea, using it in "wilful, wanton and deliberate" infringement of the patent held by Tsera, in reality [apparently] the company that actually invented the idea.

http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jul/apple_sued_for_stealing_touchpad_idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Innovation? The touchpad interface, made famous first and foremost by Apple&#8217;s very well-marketed products, is certainly an innovative feature.</p>
<p>But it seems that Apple may have stolen the idea, using it in &#8220;wilful, wanton and deliberate&#8221; infringement of the patent held by Tsera, in reality [apparently] the company that actually invented the idea.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jul/apple_sued_for_stealing_touchpad_idea" rel="nofollow">http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jul/apple_sued_for_stealing_touchpad_idea</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Monk</title>
		<link>http://blog.kennisland.nl/knowledgeland/2007/06/11/apple_and_the_art_of_innovation/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kennisland.nl/knowledgeland/2007/06/11/apple_and_the_art_of_innovation/#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the last point. Apple did not 'fail and try again' they mearly tip-toed into a  market with relatively low risk. To achieve this they took the hardware out of the equation. Apple are in business to sell hardware, not lock down a deal to distribute their software on other peoples' hardware. Other than that, great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the last point. Apple did not &#8216;fail and try again&#8217; they mearly tip-toed into a  market with relatively low risk. To achieve this they took the hardware out of the equation. Apple are in business to sell hardware, not lock down a deal to distribute their software on other peoples&#8217; hardware. Other than that, great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

